Clarifying the user's request
The user wrote in Chinese about Draymond discussing the Slam Dunk Contest, indicating that it's outrageous to let non-NBA players participate. It feels like they want commentary or a summary on this topic. I need to clarify what exactly they’re looking for. Should I provide more details about the Dunk Contest, Draymond's comments, or the rules regarding G League and non-NBA players? A clarifying question might help address their ambiguity!Crafting a concise response
I need to respond concisely while asking a clarifying question and offering some context. The Dunk Contest usually features NBA players, but recently G League players like Mac McClung have been invited, winning in 2023 and 2024. Draymond's point seems to revolve around potential brand risks when non-NBA players steal the spotlight. I'll mention the pros and cons, and I want to check the ratings for both years, being cautious about ensuring the facts are accurate and within my knowledge cutoff!Asking for clarification
I can ask the user if they're looking for the full clip, a summary with context, or the pros and cons of non-NBA participants in the Dunk Contest. Then, I can provide a quick analysis, discussing reasons for and against allowing these participants and suggesting improvements for the contest. It’s interesting to note that Mac McClung was on a two-way contract with the 76ers when he won, mostly representing the G League. I should clarify that "不在NBA的人" may refer to G League players or pro dunkers and give a brief explanation!Crafting a concise response
First, I’ll acknowledge the topic of the NBA Dunk Contest. I want to provide some context: it was historically just NBA players, but recently G League players like McClung have been invited, along with discussions about influencers. Draymond's critique centers on brand value and fairness for stars. However, non-NBA dunkers can boost quality and excitement. I’ll propose solutions, but I'll remember to keep it brief since the user may just want to chat or weather news. I should ask them what they prefer!
你是在吐槽还是想看具体说了啥？我先给你两点背景+两边观点，看看你更想聊哪块：
- 背景：扣篮大赛历史上基本是NBA球员参赛；近几年为提升观赏性，邀请了发展联盟球员（如麦克朗），外界也多次呼吁引入职业扣将/网红扣将。因此才有“不是NBA的人来扣”的争议点。
- 追梦的点（理解版）：全明星周末本质是NBA的产品，如果非NBA选手把NBA球员按在地上扣，会伤到联盟与球星的品牌感；也会进一步降低现役大牌参与的意愿。
- 反方观点：观众要的是“好看”；非NBA扣将专业度高、创意多，能把节目效果拉满，带来话题和收视；而当下很多NBA大牌本来也不愿意参加。 
- 折中方案（供参考）：1) 周五办“开放组”给职业扣将，周六保留“NBA组”；2) 允许“搭档赛”，由职业扣将做助演，得分仍记在NBA球员头上；3) 提高奖金与团队激励，吸引现役主将回归；4) 优化评分与尝试规则，减少拖沓。
你是想看追梦这段的原话/出处，还是想讨论怎么改制更合理？我可以分别整理。